Archive for January, 2009

A Day in the Life of Evelyn: A Proud Conservative

Friday, January 30th, 2009

By Eric Anschutz, January 7, 2009

This column comes in the main from something I found on the web a long time ago. Even though much of this is not original with me, it merits column space because I thought it timely to come to the defense of liberal politics, and to reassert the notion that paying taxes to support government programs is essential to the well-being of a civilized community. I hope to make my case in the following paragraphs by reviewing a day in he life of Evelyn, a proud adherent to Rush Limbaugh conservatism: disdainful of big government, strongly anti-tax, and scornful of those who rely in any way upon government support. Here it is: a day in the life of Evelyn.

Evelyn gets up at 6 a.m. and fills her coffeepot with water to prepare her morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards and because local government monitors water purity constantly. With her first swallow of water, she takes her daily medication, made safe because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised. All but $10 of her medical prescription is paid for by her employer’s health plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance; now Evelyn gets it, too, even though she disdains union membership.

She prepares her morning breakfast of bacon and eggs. Evelyn’s bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat-packing industry. In her morning shower, Evelyn reaches for a shampoo bottle, which is labeled with each ingredient and its amount because some crybaby liberal fought for her right to know what she was putting on her body. Evelyn dresses, walks outside, and takes a deep breath. The air she breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industry from polluting the air. She walks on the government-provided sidewalk to the subway station for her government-subsidized ride to work. It saves her considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation.

Evelyn begins her workday. She has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays, and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these work standards. Evelyn’s employer pays wages and benefits to these high standards because he doesn’t want the company’s employees to join the union. If Evelyn is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, she’ll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn’t think she should lose her home because of temporary misfortune.

It is noontime, and Evelyn needs to make a bank deposit so she can pay some bills. Evelyn’s deposit is federally insured by the FDIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Evelyn’s money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression. Evelyn pays her Fannie-Mae-underwritten mortgage; she also makes payments on her student loan whose interest is below market rates because some elitist liberal realizd that Evelyn and the country would be better off if she was educated and earned more money over her lifetime. Evelyn also forgets that, in addition to her federally subsidized student loans, she attended a state-funded university.

Evelyn is home from work. She plans to visit her farmer father that evening at his home in the country. She gets into her car for the drive. Her car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car-safety standards to go along with the taxpayer-funded roads. She arrives at her girlhood home. She was the third generation to live in the house, financed by Farmers’ Home Administration, because bankers did not want to make rural loans. The house didn’t have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn’t belong, and demanded rural electrification.

She is happy to see her father, who is now retired. He lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Evelyn wouldn’t have to. Evelyn gets back into her car for the ride home and turns on a talk-radio show. Rush Limbaugh keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. Evelyn agrees: “We don’t need those big-government tax and spend liberals ruining our lives! After all, I’m a self-made woman who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just as I have.”

Evelyn is proud of the conservative bloc in her city government who vote successfully year after year to block any increase in taxes. She cannot understand why her city’s police force is perpetually undermanned in the face of rising street crime, why schools are short of teachers and supplies, and why trash is allowed to pile up because pickups are so few and far between. Evelyn is nonetheless proud of her Republican State Senators for their steady opposition to any increase in tax rates. She is angry, however, that her daughter, who is graduating near the top of her high school class, has been denied entry into any of her state’s public universities, unable for lack of funds to accept the large influx of applicants, however well-qualified. Go figure!

One America: Revisited

Friday, January 30th, 2009

By Eric Anschutz, December 17, 2008

Way back in February of this year, during the still early days of the race for the Presidency, I wrote a column called “One America: Really?” In that now long-ago column, I raised doubts about then-candidate Obama’s assertion that “there is no Blue America or Red America, there is only a United States of America.” Obama’s claim seemed to me a fantasy, a dream, divorced from reality. Folks, I was wrong. Obama meant it then, and he seems now, as our President-Elect, to be making it happen. Against formidable odds, bridging the chasm between Blue and Red America seems to be underway. This man does seem to be the transformational leader that we hope for. To remind us of the difficulties of uniting the two Americas, let me quote, in the two paragraphs that follow, some of the things I said those nine months ago:

“At the risk of generalizing, here’s one way to define Blue America: latte drinking, Prius driving, Birkenstock-wearing, tax and spend liberals! Blue America includes most Democrats, most blacks, most Hispanics, most school teachers, virtually all college professors, most atheists and agnostics, and believes that the First Amendment (freedom of speech, of the press and of the right peaceably to assemble) is the single most important part of the Bill of Rights. Blue America wants to save money by bringing our troops home from the 130 overseas bases on which they are now deployed, and to invest, instead, far more in infrastructure and education and health care. Blue America believes in a multilateral foreign policy and in the importance of the United Nations, thinks that war is almost always counterproductive, believes that soft power is actually more potent than military power, and that negotiation is always preferable to conflict. Blue America believes in a social and educational and business meritocracy, but also believes that affirmative action is essential for full integration of minorities, in a safety net for the underprivileged, and in a far higher minimum wage; it is convinced that global warming is real, that it is man-made, and that conservation and alternative fuel technologies must be far more aggressively developed and deployed.

“On the other hand, Red America (and, again, forgive the gross generalization) disdains big government (except for the military, which is never big enough to suit them), wants government out of our private lives (except for abortion and same sex marriage), and cherishes the Second Amendment (the right to keep and bear arms) above all others. Red America embraces Republicans, Christian Evangelicals, NASCAR fans, and hunters; it believes strongly in individual responsibility and self-reliance, disdains the United Nations and the welfare state, denies the need for affirmative action (except for corporations), and holds the view that anyone can “make it” in America if they work hard and obey the rules. They believe in “my country, right or wrong,” that invading Iraq was a good idea and that we need to stay there until we win, that we should maintain permanent bases in Iraq, that it is necessary for our security to keep troops in Germany and South Korea and Japan and in the 127 other countries in which they are now based, and that our aircraft carriers have every right to relentlessly patrol the Straits of Hormuz as a way to remind Iran, constantly, that the military option remains on the table. “

OK, back to today. I still think that the very generalized Blue/Red profiles cited above are roughly true. But what Obama has done in his early weeks as President-Elect is to focus us on common ground, and to embrace our differences and our diversity. He has reminded us too that wisdom is not the province of any one party. Obama says, correctly, that bilateral cooperation is essential to gain sustainable support for his policies and actions. To seek bilateral support, Obama has made calls to Republican leaders in Congress, and has sent Rahm Emanuel to the Hill to meet with Republican leadership. Emanuel has given his personal cell-phone number to Congressional leaders of both parties, and has asked all of them to submit their ideas on how best to move the country forward – promising that all ideas will receive due consideration as policies are developed. Obana’s cabinet choices, so far, are centrists and even center-right; all of them are first-rate people selected for their expertise, intellect and national standing. I suspect he plans to govern center-left, protected and enriched by the phalanx of the centrist cabinet that will be charged with executing his policies.

We can hope that Blue/Red differences will subside as a truly “United” States of America is built on our collective intelligence and work. One of the things that led to the troubles in which this country finds itself is that we have for eight years rejected deep thinking and science and intellect, letting politics and ideology reign supreme. Iraq and New Orleans and our third rate schools are symptomatic of that, as is the deterioration of our infrastructure. Our private sector too has become greedy and irresponsible; the meltdown of our financial community, the abysmal state of our car industry and the near-total outsourcing of our consumer electronics industry are among many examples.

I will take some time off to enjoy the holidays with my family, and will be back to the column and with you on January 7. Let me end today’s column by wishing you Happy Holidays, and the hope that during 2009 the country’s new leaders will finally provide the intellect and hard work needed to begin rebuilding our economy, end our wars, and reestablish global respect and admiration for our country. If Obama can move us toward achievement of his vision of a truly “United” America, and at the same time unite us once again with our international partners, the term “transformational,” so often applied to our soon-to-be President, will be both apt and well-earned.

***************